What Would You Do?
The social media disruption
Ophthalmic Professional’s “What Would You Do?” presents a scenario related to contemporary practice. In addition to the expert guest commentary that follows, we invite readers to share their solutions by commenting at tinyurl.com/OPYourView.
Please include the tag “#WWYD” with your reply.
All names and locations in “What Would You Do?” are fictional and, along with the artwork, are not intended to represent an actual event.
Marilyn worked hard to get her new position, administrator for Douglas & Beldin Eye Care. In addition to long hours on the job, she took it upon herself to earn accreditation in several areas. She also took courses in leadership and human resources, all of which made her an attractive candidate for the administrator position.
Marilyn arrived in her office 30 minutes early, hoping to get a head start on her first-day tasks. She barely had time to hang up her jacket before both doctor-partners appeared in the doorway of her office. “You need to look at an email I sent ASAP,” Dr. Beldin told her.
“Is there a problem?” she asked.
“It will be easier to explain once you have the email in front of you,” Dr. Beldin replied.
Marilyn turned on her computer. The minutes felt like hours while she waited for her email program to open. She clicked on Dr. Beldin’s message and found lines of text.
“I copied these from a social media website. They were posted there Friday night by Barry, one of our technicians.”
The critical post
Marilyn began to read the posts.
“Time to unwind with a few drinks. TGIF!!!”
“Tough day at work?” was a reply that followed.
“You have no idea,” the message string continued. “We’re short staffed today so Dr. B pushes us like we’re animals. You don’t think that doesn’t affect our work or the care we provide? Then, when I get behind, I have to listen to those patient gripes!!!”
Marilyn turned from the computer screen. Dr. Beldin said, “And that’s just the start of his rant. I can understand that people can get frustrated, but this is unacceptable. I think we need to seriously consider letting Barry go.”
“I wouldn’t go that far,” said Dr. Douglas. “Barry is a good tech and this is the first time we’ve had a problem with him. I’m not saying we don’t do anything, but dismissal might be going too far. Besides, there’s nothing in our employee handbook about social media.”
“He violated our code of conduct, and this is part of a bigger problem,” said Dr. Beldin. “You’ve seen the staff in the break room. You’ve seen them before and after work. They’re always on their phones. Who knows what kinds of things they’re posting?”
“I agree this is serious,” said Marilyn.
With a fully-booked schedule ahead, the three agreed to pick up the conversation again after office hours. Marilyn knew at once she would have to meet with Barry and demand that he delete the posts. If you were Marilyn, what else would you do?
Stacy GreenwoodHR Manager, Shepherd Eye Center
Understanding the consequences
If I were in Marilyn’s position, I would not only ask Barry to remove all of his work-related social media posts, but I would also discuss with him the repercussions of his actions. I would ask him to be mindful of what he posts and remind him that such negative posts can reflect poorly on not only himself and his coworkers, but also the doctors for whom he works. Considering Barry is a good technician, I would not terminate him immediately, but I would tell him to consider our conversation a warning. I would also work on drafting a social media policy that would spell out the consequences of employees posting negative work-related posts to their social media pages.
Steve Robinson, COE, FASOAPractice Management Consultant
Pointing to a much deeper problem
In today’s world, more and more people choose to express themselves in this way because of the freedom they feel and the lack of effort required to accomplish this. The unfortunate part of this situation is that while the person posting the information does so with the delusion that only their small circle of friends is reading, in reality the whole world may do so. All too often, and sometimes to the chagrin of the poster, these words written in haste come back to haunt them.
So, why did the tech choose to post this information instead of attempting to deal with it as he should? The likely answer is that either he did not feel the freedom to discuss the problems with the proper persons or he did not think that it would do any good. In either case, the owners and management of the practice bear some, but certainly not all, of the responsibility for the incident.
True enough, most of us feel that it is not proper for the tech to vent in public, but this activity points to a much deeper problem than the absence of discretion on the employee’s part. Effective management would dictate a number of fixes for this situation: The first of which would be the establishment of an environment that would create a team approach to handling the patient load.
When employees sense that they are being “pushed like animals,” something is wrong. What they should feel is, we are short staffed and we will need to work together as a team to overcome this obstacle. Further, a clear understanding of just why it is inappropriate to “bash” your employer in the public eye is needed.
There is a fine line between what the practice can and cannot dictate when it comes to freedom of expression. Public postings that are clearly negative toward the practice and the doctors will ultimately reflect in a loss of patient confidence and, in turn, a loss of business which will impact the posting person.
While it is sad that this approach is required, personnel policies that preclude such postings should be the order of the day.
EDITOR’S NOTE: "What Would You Do?" describes a difficult scenario and asks office managers, techs and ophthalmic staff how they would approach the situation. If you have a story you would like to share, or if you would like to provide your solutions for future scenarios, please e-mail zackary.tertel@pentavisionmedia.com.